In any legal proceedings before the court of law, the application of the rules of evidence apply so as to accept the admissibility of a data message in evidence, the ground which data message and electronic communication be accepted before courts and how the course of legal proceeding best evidence can be produced and admitted. The civil proceeding it is the legal obligation shouldered on plaintiff to produce electronic evidence and plaintiff adducing it could reasonably be expected to obtain and produce before the court on the grounds that it is in its original form. The admission of electronic often not accepted as computer based file or records, the plaintiff have to produce it, some how, he has to produce into paper based form for acceptance as evidence before the court of law.
The information produced in the form of a data message shall be given due evidential weight as comparison with paper based evidence irrespective fact of non-admission before court and their inability to interpret the same because technicality of evidence. In evidence what ever form it is produced must fulfill certain assessment standards and the electronic message must be given same the evidential weight as paper based evidence, there are various factors they have to rely on the manner in which the data message was generated, stored, communicated and produced before the court of law. The integrity of the information the manner it is recorded by authenticated authorities and the manner in which its originator was identified, and any other relevant factor .
The admissibility of electronic record has recognized in electronic transaction ordinance 2002,
"... No document, record, information, communication or transaction shall be denied legal recognition, admissibility, effect, validity, proof or enforceability on the ground that it is in electronic form and has not been attested by any witness."
First if we cannot meet the evidential standard of evidence acceptable to court of law then we cannot produce it as evidence to proof something. The secondly issue relates to whether a courts have been prepared and trained to consider the digital document as evidence in the case at all and if the courts are unable to adjudicate the matter because of their inability to comprehend the technicality of subject. We have to legislate on legal issue how the digital evidence can be exhibited meeting the legal standards required for it to be admitted into evidence, then it simply be used as proof of anything. The third issue is credibility of evidence; rather we have to do with persuading the court about the extent to which it can rely upon the digital document and integrity of procedure adopted to preserve the digital evidence. In other words, even if a digital document is admitted into evidence , the court still has to determine how much weight it is willing to give it. For addressing these issues amendments have been made qunun-e-shahadat Order 1984 (law of evidence) have incorporated the provisions in our laws of evidence that can be used to allow for the admission of digital documents into evidence. Unfortunately, these are neither as modern nor as comprehensive as they should be and there is dire need of time for proper adjudication of dispute related with digital evidence we have to promulgate comprehensive laws on digital evidence.
This kind of uncertainty and question of reliance of evidence and admissibility have a severe chilling effect on the adoption of digital technologies and aggrieved parties are becoming reluctant to put file their dispute for legal adjudication before the courts. The authentication of electronic evidence and its admission as evidence is acceptable if these are printed and kept as record and the procedural requirement are fulfilled. The reliability of these types of evidence is becoming big challenge for our legal system.
The legal issue which tax system are confronting how to keep accurate books and records , although many taxpayers rely on computerized record keeping systems to a large extent for purpose of attaching evidence of transactions which has been originated as paper records in order to verify the accuracy of the electronic records. The credibility has to do with persuading the court about the extent to which it can rely upon the digital documents. In other words, even if a digital document is admitted into evidence, the court still has to determine how much weight it is willing to give to it. The electronic "documents" must be verified in order to minimize tax evasion.
Even taxpayers engaged in the sale of physical, as opposed to electronic goods can receive orders and issue invoices electronically. This is also an issue for non-tax businesses reasons. A recipient of an electronic order needs to verify and authenticate both that the order was sent by the proper person, and also needs to verify that the order was not altered in transit. There are various methods are available for authentication of documents, for example the public key encryption techniques, which are used by digital certification authorities identify digital locations of buyer and seller, and these technique can also be used to verify that electronic documents and records have not been tampered with. The "digital notarization" systems have been proposed in electronic transaction ordinance which intend to make it possible to verify the electronic documents and records rather they have been altered or not. In many countries certification of the digital document equivalent of a notary stamp which can be used to certify and seal digital records in content and time so that it can later be proved that the electronic record was created when claimed and was not altered. Taxing authorities within limit the auditing power can use these techniques to verify the authenticity of electronic transactions.
The central board of revenue provides necessary conditions for maintenance of the digital records as important as the business records that they have traditionally maintained on paper. In this context, they want to examine or retention policies for digital documents. However, for many companies, it is not sufficient for them to retain their digital documents for appropriate periods. If they become involved in litigation they may need to rely on these documentary documents to support their case. In such matter two issues emerge are important and interrelated. Firstly, will their documentary documents be admissible as evidence before a court of law as certificate copy of digital records? And secondly, if so, will the court consider these paper based record a credible source of information for imposition of e-commerce taxation?
The writer is an advocate of High Court and practicing immigration and corporate laws in Pakistan since September 2001. He is a self employed and pioneer in research on electronic commerce taxation in Pakistan. His articles were published widely in the critical areas of cyber crimes, electronic commerce, e-taxation and various other topics. He wrote LL.M thesis on titled "Legislation of electronic commerce taxation in Pakistan" in which he provided comprehensive legal proposals for statutory reconstruction of tax laws for purpose of imposition of taxation on e-business in Pakistan. Currently he is conducting is research on topic 'Electronic commerce taxation: emerging legal issues of digital evidence'.
Lawyer Press Release Distribution Service JusticeNewsFlash.com Introduces Attorney Susan Ramsey as Legal News Contributor
Legal newswire service JusticeNewsFlash.com adds South Florida based Personal Injury Lawyer Susan Ramsey as a legal news contributor / mesothelioma news editorial board consultant.
Divorce Lawyer Says Families Do Not Belong In The Court Of Law
Fresno divorce attorney Erin Rhames-Childs says that the court of law is no place to divorce. The courts are overworked and understaffed - leading to poor legal decisions that are not in the best interests of those involved. Collaborative divorce is a way for couples to divorce while maintaining their dignity, making decisions that truly are in the best interests of their children and preserving their finances. Collaborative divorce is quicker, cheaper, and better for maintaining functional relationships for after the divorce is over.
Infra-Strategy Continues Record-Breaking Growth : Managed legal services firm, focusing on bankruptcy, divorce, law firm marketing and attorney mark
Infra-Strategy, the premier provider of managed services for small law firms and other professional service firms that focuses on bankruptcy, divorce, law firm marketing and attorney marketing, today announced that the third quarter of 2008 was the company’s most successful period since being founded in 2002.
New Legal Guide to Divorce by Family Law Expert
A brand new legal guide to divorce, "Divorce and Separation Today", has been newly published by DragonCub. Far more useful than the average divorce guide, it delves into how the divorce courts operate as well as providing practical and sensible advice on emotional and other sensitive areas. It is an essential guide for anyone considering or going through divorce.
Lawyer Advice - How To Find And Seek Legal Advice From A Lawyer
With the explosion of the internet, finding the lawyer that you need for your case just seem to be the next natural thing to do since the internet is the leading source of information. Not only that, the Internet also provides the necessary information that you need about the lawyers to engage the right person to take on the case.
Legal Marketing Companies form Partnership to Enhance Law Firm Marketing Plans
Law firm marketing companies Lawyers Guide, Inc., of Harvard Illinois has entered into a partnership with Adviatech Corp., of Tampa Florida to cross market related services. The two companies offer services that compliment one another's niche markets.
'Legal Marketing Reader' Web Site Launches - Time-Saving News Source for Law Firm Marketers
The free and easy way to stay on top of law firm business development news and resources.
Car Accident Lawyer Legal Advice
Car accidents are currently the number one killer of people between the ages of 1 and 37 in the United States. Car accidents, crashes, and collisions cause about 3 million injuries a year, 2 million of which are permanent and crippling injuries per year.
Immigration Law Firm Busson & Sikorski Expands Legal Services to French-, Polish-speaking Communities
Language barriers present a huge stumbling block for non-English speakers in America, especially in the legal arena. New York law firm of Busson & Sikorski, P.C., reaches out to diverse metropolitan communities with the addition of a Polish- and French-speaking attorney to the staff.
Sanford Group Presents Marketing for Law Firms to Dallas Legal Marketing Association
Ronnie Sanford provides Dallas Legal Marketing Association with an in-depth look at the vehicles and techniques best used to influence purchasers of legal services.